The tragic death of IPS officer Y Puran Kumar, a 2001-batch officer serving in Haryana, has shaken the administrative and political landscape of the state. Found dead at his residence in Chandigarh on October 7, 2025, his death note, containing explosive allegations against senior bureaucrats, has sparked a major controversy involving charges of caste-based discrimination, harassment, and corruption.
Contents
🕰️ Chronological Timeline of Events
October 7, 2025 — The Tragedy
- Incident: IPS officer Y Puran Kumar was found dead at his residence in Chandigarh, reportedly by a self-inflicted gunshot.
- Discovery: A nine-page suicide note was recovered, naming 16 senior IAS and IPS officers.
- Allegations: The note accuses them of caste-based discrimination, humiliation, and mental harassment, while praising one IAS officer, Rajesh Khullar, for integrity and empathy.
- Immediate Response: The incident triggered widespread shock within Haryana’s police and civil administration.
October 8–9, 2025 — FIR & Wife’s Complaint
- His wife, IAS officer Amneet P. Kumar, filed a detailed complaint, alleging that senior officers — including Haryana DGP Shatrujeet Singh Kapur and Rohtak SP Narendra Bijarnia — had harassed her husband for years.
- On her request, the FIR was amended to include Section 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, treating the case as caste-related institutional harassment.
- The family refused postmortem until proper legal action and FIR modification were done.
October 10, 2025 — SIT Formed
- The Haryana government constituted a six-member Special Investigation Team (SIT) led by IG Pushpendra Kumar (Chandigarh).
- The SIT’s mandate: to conduct a time-bound, impartial probe into the officer’s death and verify the authenticity of the suicide note.
- Family members publicly stated they had “not yet received justice.”
October 11–12, 2025 — Administrative Upheaval
- Amid growing outrage, the state government sent DGP Shatrujeet Singh Kapur on leave.
- OP Singh (1992-batch IPS) was given additional charge as the new DGP.
- Rohtak SP Narendra Bijarnia, one of the officers named in the suicide note, was transferred.
- Political leaders, including Congress and BSP members, demanded suspension and arrest of all named officials.
October 13, 2025 — Legal and Political Escalation
- The FIR was officially updated under the SC/ST Act, adding harsher provisions.
- Protests intensified across Haryana.
- MPs and opposition leaders demanded a judicial inquiry and public release of the suicide note.
- Congress alleged deliberate delays, demanding the DGP’s arrest and suspension of top officers.
- BSP warned of state-wide agitation if no arrests were made within ten days.
October 14, 2025 — The Case Takes a Twist
- Another suicide occurred — ASI Sandeep Kumar, posted at the Rohtak Cyber Cell, reportedly ended his life.
- He left a three-page note and a video message, alleging that Y Puran Kumar was corrupt, used caste politics, and replaced honest officers with corrupt ones.
- Sandeep claimed he was being pressured and defamed after his superior’s death.
- His family refused to hand over the body and demanded the arrest of Amneet P. Kumar before cremation.
October 14 Onward — Investigation Stalemate
- The Chandigarh Police requested access to Y Puran Kumar’s laptop, calling it vital for evidence.
- The family, citing privacy concerns, refused to hand over the full device, suggesting forensic cloning instead.
- The postmortem remains pending, as the family insists on proper FIR action and inclusion of all accused.
- The forensic analysis of both suicide notes and digital evidence is underway, but no official findings have been released yet.
⚖️ Key Issues & Findings So Far
1. Dual Suicides and Conflicting Narratives
- The deaths of Y Puran Kumar and ASI Sandeep Kumar present opposing claims:
- One alleges institutional caste-based harassment.
- The other accuses the deceased officer of corruption and manipulation.
- This dual narrative complicates the investigation and public perception.
2. Evidence and Forensic Delays
- Laptop access has become a major roadblock. Investigators say it likely holds crucial communication and document evidence.
- Digital authentication of both suicide notes (and Sandeep’s video) is pending.
3. Legal Framework & SC/ST Act
- The inclusion of Section 3(2)(v) under the SC/ST Act strengthens the case legally.
- It may transform the probe into one focusing on systemic discrimination within the bureaucracy.
4. Administrative Fallout
- The DGP’s removal, SP’s transfer, and SIT formation mark the first wave of administrative action.
- More officers could face inquiry or suspension pending the investigation.
5. Political & Social Repercussions
- The case has become a political flashpoint in Haryana.
- Rahul Gandhi and other leaders plan to visit the bereaved family.
- Dalit organisations have condemned rising “institutional bias” and demanded judicial monitoring of the probe.
- BSP and Congress have separately called for the Governor’s intervention.
6. Public and Media Sentiment
- The case has spurred debate on:
- Mental health and workplace stress in bureaucracy
- Caste discrimination within services
- Accountability mechanisms for senior officials
- Social media and civil rights groups have trended hashtags like #JusticeForYPuranKumar and #EndBureaucraticBias.
🔍 Current Status (as of October 14, 2025)
- Investigation: SIT and Chandigarh Police continue to probe; no arrests yet.
- Autopsy: Not yet conducted due to family’s refusal.
- Laptop Evidence: Still under negotiation.
- Political Climate: Highly charged; protests continue.
- Judicial Inquiry: Demands intensifying from multiple parties.
